Welcome to Up Around the Corner, David. Since this
is your second interview, we’re going to take a little different angel. In any
case, please refresh the readers with a little about yourself, your writing and
your podcast.
Sure. I’m the author of the Dane Maddock Adventures- a
series that’s a little bit Indiana Jones and a little bit National Treasure. I
also write young adult fiction plus fantasy novels under a pseudonym. Since my
wife doesn’t want to listen to me talk about writing, I co-host ThrillerCast, a
podcast about reading, writing, and publishing in thriller and genre fiction.
I am guessing then,
that your wife doesn’t tune in to your podcast. In any case can you tell us a
little more about ThrillerCast? Why you started it, how you produce it, and
what listeners might expect if they give it a try?
Definitely not. She supports the idea of me podcasting but
thinks it’s incredibly geeky, which is interesting coming from a science nerd.
My co-host, Alan Baxter, and I started ThrillerCast mostly because we enjoy
podcasting and wanted to be a part of it, though we try to make it clear that
we are authors who podcast as a hobby—not podcasters who happen to have written
books.
Our goal with ThrillerCast is to introduce readers to a wide
variety of subgenres that have common “thriller” elements. We cover everything
from hyper-realistic thrillers to Neil Gaiman-style urban fantasy, and we
interview authors from all those different subgenres. A typical episode begins
with discussion of something current in the publishing industry and
announcements of any new releases that might be of interest to our listeners.
We then take a break, after which we’ll either have an interview or we’ll take
an in-depth look at some aspect of the craft of writing. Make sure to listen
all the way through the closing credits because we almost always have a blooper
or outtake at the end!
Your wife is a
science nerd. Does her science interest(s) tie into her career? And do you
avoid discussing her job as she does your writing and podcasting? Or might her
geeky science interests and her career ever get reflected in the contents of
your writing?
There aren’t many limits to what we’ll discuss on
ThrillerCast, so her job garners the occasional mention, mostly in the context
of, “I’m so glad I don’t have her job.” She’s a forensic scientist in the DNA
section of the state crime lab, and I’m very proud of the work she does. She’s
actually answered questions for other authors on topics that relate to
forensics. For me, the biggest impact her work has had on my writing is to
teach me that it’s important to really know your stuff if you’re going to go
into detail. She loves crime and thriller fiction, and is forgiving to a point,
but gets rowdy when the author goes too far afield on her topic.
I can understand your
wife’s perspective on accuracy. You write thrillers, packed with travel,
adventure including some creatures and places that are ‘mythical’ or based on
tales or legends. How do you deal with this, with respect to accuracy?
With actual places, I try to be as close to reality as
possible. I’ve visited many of the locations in my books, but I still use Google street view,
YouTube videos, and images from the web to refresh my memory about small
details. With the legends and historical backdrops, it’s fascinating how often
you uncover minor details that fall perfectly into place. It’s always a
pleasant surprise and the reader thinks you planned it that way.
I do, however, reserve the right to make minor alterations
to events and details for the sake of the story, and I’ve taken to adding a
note to readers reminding them of that. I’d rather them be annoyed with me for
playing with reality than having them think I didn’t do my research.
You have a new novel
recently released, Buccaneer. Can you
tell us a little about it, and what research you had to do in preparation to
write it?
Buccaneer begins
on Oak Island , home of the legendary “Money
Pit.” As with most Dane Maddock adventures, we end up on a globe-hopping
adventure while battling secret organizations, fighting “monsters,” and
unraveling ancient mysteries. I don’t want to spoil the book, so I won’t get
too specific, but I researched: Captain Kidd, Oak
Island , several locations on both
sides of the Atlantic , a well-known order, myths
surrounding a certain legendary figure, and several types of reptiles.
That sounds like
quite an array of topics. How much time would you estimate it took to do the
research for Buccaneer? Do you do
much of the research for your novels ahead of time, most of it as you go, or is
there a middle ground? And, as Buccaneer
is your 5th Dane Maddock novel, are you getting more
efficient/faster at it?
That’s difficult to measure. I’m always collecting links and
information that might work for future novels. Once I’m ready to start, I spend
about a week researching the historical backdrop, the MacGuffin (the object
that drives the story) and the settings of the first few scenes. After that, I
let the story take me where it leads and I stop to research as needed.
Buccaneer got off
to a rocky start. I’m a discovery writer by nature, but I tried to research and
outline the entire book ahead of time. It didn’t work, and I ended up scrapping
a good chunk of the book and started over. Once I rebooted, it did go faster
than previous novels. I know the characters so intimately that it’s easier to
know how they will react in given situations. Also, as they become more “real”
to me, they will sometimes take the story in surprising directions.
When you say you’re a
discovery writer, does that mean you know where the story will start, the
MacGuffin, and a few places it’s likely to ‘drive’ the characters? Do you know
the ending, or have a good feel for it? Or is that part of the discovery
process?
I know the historical backdrop, the MacGuffins, the enemy,
the creepy creatures the heroes will encounter, and have a short list of cool
places they might go, though I reserve the right to change my mind. I always
know where they’ll start, and what the “inciting incident” that sets the plot
in motion will be. I usually have only a general idea of how things will end. I
figure, if I can surprise myself, I’ll surprise the readers. Doing it that way
can sometimes mean adding or changing early scenes when I go back to work on
the second draft, so I keep a running list of changes that need to be made when
it’s time to revise. I never go back and make those changes before I finish the
first draft, though, because who knows what other changes I’ll make along the
way that impact those revisions? It can make the second draft a little more
work, but it’s what works for me.
Can you tell the
readers what you find the most exciting and the most frustrating as a writer?
I think nothing excites me more than to hear from a reader
who enjoys my work. The idea that someone reads and enjoys my stories thrills
me, and for someone to take the time to write and let me know is both a
delightful and humbling experience.
As far as frustration goes, I think the “mushy middle” of
any book drives me mad. There’s always the thrill of starting a new story, and
the high of finishing it, but there’s always a point in the middle where I hit
roadblocks, experience doubts, or both. It’s like the sophomore year of
college, which I hated so much I did it four times.
A final two questions
before we wrap up this interview. How do you push through roadblocks and
doubts? And, what’s your favorite food and have you ever incorporated it into
one of your novels?
It depends on the roadblock. If it’s a plot problem, a long
walk or drive, or some kind of project around the house that lets my mind
wander will usually do the trick. In those circumstances, I find it helps if I
get the headphones out of my ears and just let my mind drift. If it’s more of
an emotional or mental issue, I just plow on through.
I don't
think I can possibly pick a favorite food- I like too many of them. Dane
Maddock readers might recognize my favorite beer, Dos Equis black label, as Dane’s
beer of choice as well as that of his crew.
Is there anything I
missed or that you’d like to say to the readers?
I’m part of a new project called Thriller Central. It’s a
reader-focused site for reviews, interviews, and news in the thriller genre.
Check it out at www.thrillercentral.org
Thanks for the chat!
You’re welcome,
David. Thanks for taking the time to answer a few questions.
To learn a little more about David Wood and his writing, visit his website: http://davidwoodweb.com/
`
Great interview!
ReplyDeleteIt actually helped me realize why my current WiP has stalled.
Never paid much attention to the inciting incident, because it usually came out on its own, but this time, it hadn't... hmmm...
Cool, Misha. Hope you make some more forward progress now!
DeleteNice interview. Those books look good!
ReplyDeleteHe's a good writer/author, Angie. And diverse.
DeleteGreat interview; David is a talented and engaging author. I'm behind on the series but if anyone reading this thinks, "I'll just read the Dane Maddock adventures because that's the kind of book I like," don't stop there! David's other works are every bit as good - I highly recommend "The Zombie Driven Life"; and that is coming from someone who thinks all the zombie and vampire books on the market are a scourge on the Earth.
ReplyDeleteX
Xanthrope,
DeleteI've only read Cibola in the series thus far, but read Into the Woods and also The Zombie Driven life which I agree is top-notch and highly recommended.